Very True

Nice article from a nice dame.

College liberals are in a fit of pique because various speakers are coming to their campuses this week as part of David Horowitz's Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week -- not to be confused with Islamo-Fascism Appreciation Week, which I believe is in April.


But here's the truest part:

Apparently liberals support Islamo-fascism.

Debunking Atheists

Great article here on Townhall. Here's the part I like the most:

"Christianity is the very root and foundation of Western civilization." Because of its premise that man is created in God's image, Christianity is foundational to our firm belief in man's dignity and our higher notions of morality, even many the secularists have plagiarized as their own. D'Souza warns that we cannot remove the Christian foundation without, ultimately, removing its values along with it.

Boo Hooo HOOO

Here's your typical whiny liberal:

Al Whore

Here's a beautiful letter to Al Whore:

Dear Albert,

So you won the Nobel Prize. You know, there have been so many times in my life I wish I could get worldwide recognition for being a lying sack of crap. But, alas, it was not to be. Your former boss has the market cornered on that. And you're just insane, so you got me trumped yet again.

I'm forced to wonder what it's really like being a neurotic, narcissist with delusions of grandeur. Could you maybe write me back and tell me what it's like? Yet again, I'm on the outside looking in. I think on my gravestone I'll have to put "Just Short of a Lunatic". I guess I'm not even good at that.

Anyway, you must be proud of yourself. Heck, I would be. And how is your drunk, drug addict son? I wonder what lovely family life drove him to that, Mr. Peace Prize? I also wonder what effect this all will have on him. You know, the idea that his dad won a smelly European medal for lies and politically motivated propaganda? I mean if a scumbag, anti-Semite bastard like Jimmy Carter can win it, well, hey....the sky's sorta the limit, ya know. So you're in good company, Al. Being an idiot to start with made you a virtual sure thing.

I really hope you run for president. The sadistic part of me wants to watch you be the spectacular failure that you will no doubt be. You see, you are an incompetent. You are the Dan Quayle of this generation and you constantly prove that with every non sequitur you utter. It's great in this day and age to be able to count on something.

Well, I know you're busy, so I'll cut this short. You know, Al, I wanted to say that I really do like you. And as nasty as I have been, I know you are searching for meaning, like so many of us are. I have the utmost respect for that. Hell, it's all there is in life. And, like you, I mastered the "making an ass out of myself" part long ago.

So, you go, girl!

And remember: if it comes from nothing, that's the only place it has to go. Enjoy it while you can. Utter meaninglessness has its advantages.

Oh, so sincerely,

Andrew T. Durham,Maniac

Andrew T. Durham Author, http://www.americanchronicle.com

Moonbats

Moonbats got you down?

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! I LOVE IT

Putin in Iran?

I should have seen this coming from a mile away. Damn collaborators!



Heil, Comrades!

Social Effects of Evolution

Damn liberal "scientists" get all wet when talking about evolution. But when will these dumasses consider the social effects of evolution? I thought they were all about socialism????

Conservapedia has the answer:

There have been great social effects of evolution in regards to its acceptance by various individuals in the course of history. The theory of evolution has been influential in regards to Social Darwinism, Nazism, Communism, and racism

Liberal Media and Socialized Junk Economics

From Human Events---On October 9th , NPR’s Robert Siegel interviewed Stephen Colbert. The discussion was both entertaining and ironic. Colbert mentioned that he reads the NY Times because he wants to know what “the enemy” is doing. He made a humorous, polite and salient comment that NPR demonstrates a liberal bias, including from Siegel.

What was ironic was how quickly Colbert was proven right in Siegel’s interview of Paul Krugman, a liberal love fest of junk economics and revisionist political history. As Daniel Patrick Moynihan said, “You are entitled to your opinion, but you’re not entitled to your own facts.”Krugman made the socialist argument that the country’s “progress” would be enhanced if “the gains from trade were more equally distributed”. It should be stunning that someone who is theoretically a trained economist can be so wrong so consistently, but we have to remember this is the New York Times. They’re not in the news business: they’re in the political activist business.

Vice President Pawlenty

From the National Review--This will be a good move for Guiliani after he beats the piss out of Hitlery:

Although he is not yet appearing on media shortlists for likely Republican running mates, Governor Pawlenty is an obvious choice. Here’s why.

For one thing, Republicans still have a good shot to win next year. Consider the enormous disapproval rating for the Democratic Congress, some signs of progress in Iraq, and above all — the strong economy. Much of the calculus in the Electoral College will be involved in seeing whether the Republicans can win key battleground states in the Midwest. In 2004, President Bush won Ohio, and consequently reelection, by less than 120,000 votes. This time around, Ohio looks much stronger for the Democrats , which will require a new strategy on the part of Republicans.

Senator Lynne Cheney. I Like That.

Finally, a classy broad in the news. One of my favorite ladies, Lynne Cheney is being considered to take over for the late Craig Thomas, according to The Politico.

Lynne Cheney, wife of Vice President Dick Cheney, is being floated in Senate GOP leadership circles as a possible replacement for the late Sen. Craig Thomas (R-Wyo.), who died Monday night. Susan Thomas, the late senator's wife, has also been mentioned by Senate Republicans as a potential choice to take over for her husband, as well as former Justice Department official Tom Sansonetti.

One GOP insider said Lynne Cheney had been in Washington "too long" to be acceptable to the Wyoming GOP, despite her long resume, although that would change if Cheney were to return to Wyoming on a full-time basis. Susan Thomas is reportedly not interested in serving out her husband's term.

Maybe a move like this can springboard into a late 2008 ticket of....(wait for it)

JEB BUSH

LYNNE CHENEY

Now that's a ticket I can get behind!

Who Won the Republican Debate?

According to this article, it was McCain.

1. McCain Iraq definitely plays a significant role on the election, and McCain handled this issue well. On the issue of going to war, he gave a good case how the UN sanctions were slowly falling apart and how Saddam, given his prior record, could and would have gone after WMDs once the UN with its oil-for-food scandal eventually took the pressure off of him. His explanation for the war makes much more sense than Bush's explanation.
While admitting to mismanagement in the war on Iraq, McCain also laid out a good case on why we need to stay the course and avoid the dire consequences of failure. He also laid out a great criticism of Hillary: Iraq is not Bush's war as Hillary said, nor is Kosovo Clinton's war; both are America's war as a nation, and the nation has a huge stake in the outcome of Iraq, no matter what has happened up to this point.
In the second half of the debate, McCain really hammered all of this home with his best moment of the campaign. Receiving a question from a woman who lost family in Iraq, he gave her what he called “straight talk.” While giving a realistic picture of the war and how mistakes have created unnecessary deaths, the Vietnam veteran still showed how he wanted to achieve success to honor every lost life in Iraq, praising the new strategy and the new general in Iraq. Crafting a fine balance between reality and optimism, McCain drew an enormous round of applause from the audience.
At the beginning of the debate, McCain took a pounding on the issue of immigration. He received a lot of criticism of his bill, and generally his stance on immigration did not sit well with Republicans. He did make up a lot of ground there, however. He argued a good point on how he had to compromise to do something, and fighting while doing nothing amounts to de facto amnesty. Also, he gave a sensational answer that portrayed immigrants as our friends, not our enemies, towards the end of the debate.
On other issues like Don't Ask, Don't Tell and energy independence, McCain had some good answers, but he did not really differentiate himself very much from other candidates. But by handling Iraq superbly and holding his ground on immigration, McCain propelled himself to the top of the pack last night.

2. Romney Romney did an especially good job of projecting his own personal character and integrity. After McCain took some huge shots on him at immigration before the debate, Romney called McCain his friend and refused to make the issue personal. He also had a dignified response to the Mormon question, calling it a fair question and giving an honest yet impressive answer about his faith.
On immigration, he had the best moment in the first half when he said the solution to immigration was to enforce the '86 laws (which were supposed to solve the problems concerning immigration) which called for employment verification and border security, drawing huge applause. He also had a great criticism on how Z-visas can allow illegal immigrants to stay in the country for all their lives.
He had some great original ideas elsewhere. On the issue of Iran, he highlighted reaching out to moderate Muslims. While many candidates talked about energy independence and national security, only Romney specifically cited how our oil dependence benefits Chavez, Ahmadinejaid, and Putin. I also liked his use of the non-sequitur logical fallacy on the issue of Iraq (although it was hard to follow); had we known back then what we know today about Iraq, that would have probably meant Saddam was cooperating much more than he actually did.
He really faded in the second half of the debate, though. His answers seemed to go off in tangents frequently. He had a good point on optimism and hope for the future, but he struggled to articulately express his views and draw applause like he frequently did early on. Even on healthcare, a strong issue for Romney given his healthcare bill that passed in Massachusetts, he could have done a better job of highlighting all his good work there. While McCain and Giuliani gained ground, he made little headway, dropping him from the first spot below McCain and almost below Giuliani.

3. Giuliani Giuliani displayed some strong credentials as a potential commander-of-chief on Iraq and terrorism, and also joined with McCain in eliciting some applause when answering the question for the woman who lost family in Iraq. To some extent, though, he displayed too much rhetoric and not enough argumentation. When he tried to connect Saddam to the war on terror, he could have used more hard evidence, and he could also have provided more explicit details on the consequences of failure in Iraq.
However, when Giuliani, a pro-choice candidate, received a question comparing his personal opposition to abortion to Pontius Pilate personally opposing Jesus' crucifixion while washing his hands on the matter, the lightning that disrupted the stage — while humorous — highlighted a serious trouble for him. He never directly answered the question, dancing around the issue as usual. Being pro-choice won't necessarily break his campaign, but he really needs to come up with a clear and direct answer to his views that would draw applause from an audience.
That being said, though, Giuliani performed well overall. He established some good, specific, criticism of McCain's immigration bill, and he also had a good proposal for taking on an Apollo-like program to establish energy independence. On Don't Ask, Don't Tell, he defused the problem quite well, even citing Colin Powell. However, given the strong performance of McCain and Romney, I do have put him at the bottom of the top three.

But I don't trust the liberal media. If you ask me, they are ALL winners. What's funny is that the Democrat Party is so weak, we could run Warren Harding out there and clean house.

Guiliani and his heroism, McCain and his straight talk, Romney and his chiseled features, Tancredo protecting us from Mexican invaders, Brownback and his Christian values, Huckabee with his weight-loss efforts, Ron Paul...well he's an idiot. But the rest are great too. God Bless America!

Libby 30 Years--For What? Bad Memory???

This is a shame. Libby is clearly the fall guy for these damn Bush-haters.

Former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby was sentenced to 30 months in prison today for lying and obstructing the CIA leak investigation. Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, stood calmly before a packed courtroom as a federal judge said the evidence overwhelmingly proved his guilt. "People who occupy these types of positions, where they have the welfare and security of [the] nation in their hands, have a special obligation to not do anything that might create a problem," U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton said. Libby was convicted in March of lying and obstructing an investigation into the 2003 leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity. Read More

God, I Hate Hillary

Good article from Townhall.

Check out this quote-

"Fairness doesn't just happen. It requires the right government policies."

Wrong dammit! It requires government to butt out. God, I hate Hillary.

Buy This Book

War on Terror Working

Just a little more proof that the War on Terror is working:

According to NewsChannel4's Jonathan Dienst, three people were arrested and one other was being sought Saturday in connection to a plot to blow up jet-fuel lines at John F. Kennedy International Airport, officials said.
Four people have been charged. One is in custody in New York. Three suspects in total are in custody. One is still at large in Trinidad.

Another attack averted, no thanks to the surrender monkey liberals. God Bless America!

Voters are Stupid

I've got the report from Cato. Chew on that.

Welcome

I've decided to join the blogosphere in the battle of good (USA) vs everyone else (liberals). Let the games begin.